Performance Evaluation of Urban and Rural Areas for VANET
Keywords:
VANET, AODV, DSR and IEEE80211pAbstract
VANET is different from MANET due to high mobility of nodes and the large scale of networks. Security and traffic are the two main concerns in designing a VANET. Although there are many proposed solutions for improving securities in VANET but security still remains a delicate research subject. In this paper Creation of Rural area network and Urban area network in VANET Scenario for NS-2 and then to create Different routing protocols with the use of Various performance matrices Like Residual Energy and Throughput with two routing protocols which are AODV and DSR.
References
[1] IEEE P802.11p, “Amendment 3: wireless access in vehicular environments (WAVE),” Draft D0.26, January 2006.
[2] N. Balon, and J. Guo, “Increasing Broadcast Reliability in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks,” In Proc. of the 3rd ACM Int. Workshop on Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks VANET'06, NY, USA, pp. 104-105, 2006. [3] H. Alshaer and E. Horlait, “An optimized adaptive broadcast scheme for inter-vehicle communication,” In Proc. of the 61st Int. IEEE Vehicular Technology Conf. VTC‟05, vol.5, pp. 2840–2844, 2005.
[4] G. Korkmaz, E. Ekici, F. Özgüner, and U. Özgüner, "Urban multi-hop broadcast protocol for inter-vehicle communication systems," In Proc. of the 1st ACM Int. Workshop on Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks VANET'04, NY, USA, pp. 76-85, 2004. [5] J. Harri, F. Filali, and C. Bonnet, “Mobility models for vehicular ad hoc networks: a survey and taxonomy,” The Institut Eurecom Department of Mobile Communications, FRANCE, 2007.
[6] GM advanced technology, Vehicle-to-Vehicle technology, [7] “Assessment of the applicability of cooperative vehicle-highway automation systems to bus transit and intermodal freight: case study,” California Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways (PATH), 2004.
[8] “London Congestion Charging Technology Trials,” Transport for London, Feb 2005.
[9] G. Korkmaz, E. Ekici, F. Özgüner, and U. Özgüner, "Urban multi-hop broadcast protocol for inter-vehicle communication systems," In Proc. of the 1st ACM Int. Workshop on Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks VANET'04, NY, USA, pp. 76-85, 2004. [10] B. Parno, and A. Perrig “Challenges in securing vehicular networks,” In Proc. of the Int. Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (HotNets-IV), 2005.
[11] A. Huhtonen, “Comparing AODV and OLSR Routing Protocols”, session on Internetworking, April 2004.
[12] A. Aaron and J. Weng, “Performance Comparison of Ad-hoc Routing Protocols for Networks with Node Energy Constraints”, IEEE INFOCOM, Hong Kong, 2004.
[13] Elizabeth M. Royer, Chai-Keong Toh, “A Review of Current Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Mobile Wireless Networks”, IEEE Personal Communications, April 1999.
[14] C. E. Perkins and P. Bhagwat, “Highly Dynamic Destination-Sequenced Distance Vector Routing (DSDV) for Mobile Computers”, Comp. Comm. Rev., Oct. 1994, pp. 234-44.
[15] J. Broch, D. A. Maltz, D. B. Johnson, Y. Hu and J. Jetcheva, “A Performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad hoc network routing protocols,” in Proc. ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. on Mobile Computing and Networking, pp. 85-97, October 1998.
[16] C. Mbarushimana, A. Shahrabi, and H. Larijani, "The effect of routing protocol dynamics on TCP performance in mobile ad hoc networks," in Proceedings of the First International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems, NBiS 2007, Regensburg, Germany, 2007, pp. 20-29, 2007.
[17] C. Adjih, M. Pascale, M. Paul, B. Emmanuel and P. Thierry, "QoS support, security and OSPF.
